TSK-001008 · Vendor study context

Reviewed the Vendor Filterability Study as a Design Baseline for Ceramic Filtration: Membrane Flux, Pore Size, Clean-Water-Flux Recovery After CIP and Filtrate Turbidity

Explore the capability, case, and equipment connections for this activity.

Conceptual engineering illustration: procurement logistics
Conceptual engineering visualization · AI generated

Case Context

Ceramic Membrane Ceramic-Crossflow System Integration ↗

Project Context

PRJ-A-010 · Ceramic Crossflow Filter System + Ion Exchange Trial ↗

Capabilities

Measures & Operating Context

MeasureValueType & meaningAttribution & operating context
Operating Measureapproximately 90 %Baseline
Vendor laboratory baseline

Applies to: Reviewed the vendor filterability study as a design baseline for ceramic filtration: membrane flux, pore size, clean-water-flux recovery after CIP and filtrate turbidity

study, 2018 — after one CIP — Clean-water-flux recovery in the filtration supplier vendor study.

Turbidity0.26 to 0.39 NTUBaseline
Vendor laboratory baseline

Applies to: Reviewed the vendor filterability study as a design baseline for ceramic filtration: membrane flux, pore size, clean-water-flux recovery after CIP and filtrate turbidity

study, 2018 — filtrate — Filtrate turbidity in the filtration supplier vendor study.

Membrane Flux138 L/m²/hBaseline
Vendor laboratory baseline

Applies to: Reviewed the vendor filterability study as a design baseline for ceramic filtration: membrane flux, pore size, clean-water-flux recovery after CIP and filtrate turbidity

study, 2018 — Membrane flux — study, 2018

Membrane Pore Size0.2 µmEquipment Rating
Vendor laboratory membrane specification

Applies to: Reviewed the vendor filterability study as a design baseline for ceramic filtration: membrane flux, pore size, clean-water-flux recovery after CIP and filtrate turbidity

study, 2018 — Membrane pore size — study, 2018

All Portfolio Connections

All portfolio connections (8)

Project Ownership and Delivery Context

Owned the full project lifecycle: capital planning and prioritization, need definition, feasibility and scope development, engineering and AFE justification, procurement and vendor coordination, construction sequencing and field oversight, commissioning, turnover, and post-startup support. Connected operating requirements with technical scope, funding decisions, execution readiness, and the needs of operations and maintenance.

Compared filtration options against demand and lifecycle requirements, integrated CIP and instrumentation with dedicated electrical feeds, and developed clean-water-flux tracking and maintenance follow-up. Ion-exchange testing extended the investigation into product clarity and quality, while modular expansion planning connected the equipment choice with future operating demand.

Related Analysis and Application Artifacts

WHAT COMES NEXT

Complex Challenge?
Let’s Work Through It.

Engineering leadership, capital projects, and independent consulting.

Start a conversation ↗