TSK-001019 · Equipment option
Evaluated the C3E 4/454 Proposal as a Capital Option, Including the Two-Phase Bowl and Scroll, Contact Materials, Wear Protection, Drives, Controls, Monitoring, Optional Feed/Centrate Integration and Commercial Schedule
Explore the capability, case, and equipment connections for this activity.
Roles & Contributions
Project Ownership
Full lifecycle project ownership
Technical Oversight and Coordination
Evaluated the C3E decanter proposal as a capital option, reviewing configuration, controls, monitoring, integration and commercial schedule.
Owned the full project lifecycle: capital planning and prioritization, need definition, feasibility and scope development, engineering and AFE justification, procurement and vendor coordination, construction sequencing and field oversight, commissioning, turnover, and post-startup support. Connected operating requirements with technical scope, funding decisions, execution readiness, and the needs of operations and maintenance.
Case Context
Rice Wine Decanter Trial ↗Capabilities
- Compare Equipment Lifecycle Ownership CostsRecorded application
Why these connect
The source model links this activity to the capability.
- Compare Separation Alternatives Under Operating ConditionsRecorded application
Why these connect
The source model links this activity to the capability.
- Translate Trial Findings into Equipment DecisionsRecorded application
Why these connect
The source model links this activity to the capability.
Measures & Operating Context
| Measure | Value | Type & meaning | Attribution & operating context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bowl Diameter | 14.5 in | Design Parameter Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Bowl — Bowl diameter — Bowl |
| Rotational Speed | <= 4,000 rpm | Equipment Rating Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Rated maximum — Rotational speed — Rated maximum |
| Centrifugal Acceleration | <= 3,300 g | Equipment Rating Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Rated maximum — Centrifugal acceleration — Rated maximum |
| Motor Power | 20 HP | Equipment Rating Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Bowl drive — Motor power — Bowl drive |
| Motor Power | 5 HP | Equipment Rating Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Scroll drive — Motor power — Scroll drive |
| HMI Display Size | 10 in | Design Parameter Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule operator display — HMI display size — operator display |
| Engineering Submittal Lead Time | 10 weeks | Estimate Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule After order acceptance — Engineering submittal lead time — After order acceptance |
| Onsite Service Allowance | 10 days | Quotation Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Proposal service — Onsite service allowance — Proposal service |
| Equipment Delivery Lead Time | 30 to 34 weeks | Estimate Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule After order acceptance — Equipment delivery lead time — After order acceptance |
| Scroll Speed | 1 to 10 rpm | Equipment Rating Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Scroll drive — Scroll speed |
| Continuous Scroll Torque | 2,750 N m | Equipment Rating Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Scroll reducer — Continuous scroll torque |
| Vendor Stated Bowl-Power Reduction | approximately 20 % | Estimate Vendor-projected bowl-power reduction | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Recuvane option — Decanter supplier proposal estimates approximately 20% bowl-motor power reduction for the Recuvane option; not a measured site energy saving. |
| Supply Phase Count | 3 phases | Equipment Rating Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Electrical supply — Supply phase count |
| Supply Frequency | 60 Hz | Equipment Rating Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Electrical supply — Supply frequency |
| Supply Voltage | 480 V | Equipment Rating Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Electrical supply — Supply voltage |
| Approximate Unit Weight | approximately 3,900 lb | Equipment Rating Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule C3E option — Approximate unit weight |
| Submittal Review Allowance | 2 weeks | Estimate Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule After engineering submittal — Submittal review allowance |
| Illustrated Centrate-Tank Capacity | 130 US gal | Equipment Rating Vendor proposal | Applies to: Evaluated the C3E 4/454 proposal as a capital option, including the two-phase bowl and scroll, contact materials, wear protection, drives, controls, monitoring, optional feed/centrate integration and commercial schedule Z3E 4/454 arrangement drawing — Illustrated centrate-tank capacity |
All Portfolio Connections
All portfolio connections (10)
- Pilots, Trials, and Production-Scale Evaluation — Application Review Review artifact
- Supplier Qualification and Technology Maturity — Application Review Review artifact
- Compare Equipment Lifecycle Ownership Costs Recorded application
- Compare Separation Alternatives Under Operating Conditions Recorded application
- Translate Trial Findings into Equipment Decisions Recorded application
- Compared an Estimated 50–75% Capital-Cost Advantage and Four-to-Five-Times Longer Rebuild Intervals with Separator-Style Alternatives, Alongside a Planned Three-to-Four-Week Post-Order Pilot Window Shared case
- Planned Temporary Tri-Clamp and Camlock Connections, Sanitary Sampling Valves, Hoses, Drain Routing, CIP Adaptation, Flow Measurement, HMI Access, Vendor Laboratory Support and ROI/TCO Evaluation Shared case
- Evaluated the C3E 4/454 Proposal as a Capital Option, Including the Two-Phase Bowl and Scroll, Contact Materials, Wear Protection, Drives, Controls, Monitoring, Optional Feed/Centrate Integration and Commercial Schedule ↗ Existing portfolio connection
- Rice Wine Decanter Trial Existing portfolio connection
- Rice Wine Decanter Trial Existing portfolio connection
Related Analysis and Application Artifacts
- Pilots, Trials, and Production-Scale Evaluation — Application ReviewCapability application review
- Supplier Qualification and Technology Maturity — Application ReviewCapability application review