CASE-021 · Engineering case

Ceramic Crossflow Option Comparison and AFE Clarification

Defended ceramic crossflow investment by clarifying Option 1 vs. Option 2 operating-cost, membrane-life, and process-risk assumptions.

Conceptual engineering visualization: Ceramic Crossflow Option Comparison and AFE Clarification
Conceptual engineering visualization · AI generated

Why the Work Mattered

Purpose and Operating Need

Defended ceramic crossflow investment by clarifying Option 1 vs. Option 2 operating-cost, membrane-life, and process-risk assumptions.

Engineering Approach

Engineering Approach

Clarified Current Process, Option 1 / Option 2 Design Basis, Prefilter Cost, Membrane Replacement Model, and CIP / Product-Segregation Strategy.

Outcome & Engineering Context

Defended ceramic crossflow investment by clarifying Option 1 vs. Option 2 operating-cost, membrane-life, and process-risk assumptions.

Workstream Results & Impact

Workstream Portfolio Rollup

18,317,000 USD

Wine Clarification and Vinegar Polishing Modernization

Recorded workstream portfolio reference. This is the workstream-level value and is not a project expenditure or a new total of reassigned projects.

Measures & Operating Detail

MeasureValueType & meaningAttribution & operating context
Annual OPEX Difference150,000 USD/yearEstimate
Corrected operating-cost difference

Applies to: Ceramic Crossflow Option Comparison and AFE Clarification

$150,000 annual operating-cost difference, corrected from a capital-cost interpretation.

Engineering scope and design basis

$150K corrected from CAPEX to annual OPEX difference ; 7 to 10 year filtration-supplier membrane life; prefilter OPEX.

Actions, Methods & Controls

ACTIVITIES IN CONTEXT

Additional Technical Detail

Roles & contributions
  • Project Ownership

    Full lifecycle project ownership

    Owned the full project lifecycle: capital planning and prioritization, need definition, feasibility and scope development, engineering and AFE justification, procurement and vendor coordination, construction sequencing and field oversight, commissioning, turnover, and post-startup support. Connected operating requirements with technical scope, funding decisions, execution readiness, and the needs of operations and maintenance.

Workstream context
All portfolio connections
Project ownership and delivery context

Owned the full project lifecycle: capital planning and prioritization, need definition, feasibility and scope development, engineering and AFE justification, procurement and vendor coordination, construction sequencing and field oversight, commissioning, turnover, and post-startup support. Connected operating requirements with technical scope, funding decisions, execution readiness, and the needs of operations and maintenance.

Compared filtration options against demand and lifecycle requirements, integrated CIP and instrumentation with dedicated electrical feeds, and developed clean-water-flux tracking and maintenance follow-up. Ion-exchange testing extended the investigation into product clarity and quality, while modular expansion planning connected the equipment choice with future operating demand.

Related analysis and application artifacts
Connected collections

WHAT COMES NEXT

Complex Challenge?
Let’s Work Through It.

Engineering leadership, capital projects, and independent consulting.

Start a conversation ↗